1. About.com
  2. Education
  3. Physics

Discuss in my forum

Andrew Zimmerman Jones

Are We All Holograms?

By , About.com Guide   January 16, 2009

Follow me on:

Over a decade ago, two top quantum physicists proposed the holographic principle, which meant that everything in our universe might exist on the boundary of the universe. Today, static noise detected at a sophisticated physics instrument might just be proving them correct!

The holographic principle states that the total information contained within a volume correlates to information contained on the surface - in other words, the total amount of information a space can contain is defined by the surface area as opposed to the volume. This counter-intuitive notion is exactly what happens when trying to calculate the entropy of black holes, though, which is one major argument in favor of the principle.

A recent report in New Scientist, indicates that the German gravity wave detector GEO600 has been detecting some strange "noise." This noise has been explained by Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics director Craig Hogan as possibly resulting from us living within exactly this sort of holographic universe.

In the holographic principle, the information contained on the surface boundary of the space is in Planck length-sized squares. Hogan realized that if this boundary defines the total number of information "bits" that the space can contain, then each individual bit inside the space would have to be bigger than a Planck length ... in essence, the holographic universe is "blurry" compared to the surface.

And a blurry unit of space-time is one which could potentially be explored by experiments (as opposed to Planck-sized units of space-time, which are well outside of the range our current technology can explore). He calculated a prediction that GEO600 would be able to detect some sort of disturbance due to this ... and found out that they'd already detected exactly this problem!

This puts the mission of GEO600 in danger (the noise could prevent them from detecting the gravity waves it was designed to search for), but it allows what is likely an even more profound discovery - the potential to first detect the smallest grains of space-time itself. If this does turn out to be "holographic noise," then it could be a crucial step toward determining a correct theory of quantum gravity.

Related Articles:

NOTE: In an e-mail on January 18, Leonard Susskind - one of the men who discovered the holographic principle - indicates that he is not clear how Dr. Hogan expects a gravity wave detector to detect holographic noise.

Comments

January 21, 2009 at 3:35 pm
(1) Bob Novella says:

Andrew, Beautiful summary, well done.

I can’t wait to see how this plays out.

January 22, 2009 at 11:22 am
(2) mgermine says:

Andrew,

As we know, physics prohibits signals faster than the speed of light. If we look at the hologram of the Universe, papered on its outer border, it would seem to bring elements of reality into direct contact which are separated in spacetime, thus allowing signals faster than light. Am I missing something here?

February 2, 2009 at 1:33 pm
(3) acx says:

Soooo— Galileo, Copernicus, etal were wrong and the Pope was right? The Earth is acually the center of the universe?

March 21, 2009 at 6:53 pm
(4) MARK says:

if the holographic theory proves true,then the idea of multiverses is infinite and makes the big bang theory although almost certain ,renders it meaningless to the human race

January 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm
(5) Tom says:

Really interesting theory, but one thing that shocked me is that i have heard this noise before, during a deep form of medatatation(believe it or not). I am spiritual, but also scientific, was just amazed by the coincidence. Would like to know other peoples comments ps i don’t take drugs or have a mental illness.

January 24, 2011 at 11:20 am
(6) June says:

I watched the Horizon programme and it seemed evident to me that we cannot be holograms. The reason is that if particles are “watched” then they behave normally. Particles that small would have to be able to become anything else in the universe as they are the basic blocks of all matter. But when they grow larger or combine, they are subject to the rules of gravity, etc. When something is alive it has a “will”, be it a tree or a human being. We are “watching” or “directing” our atoms with our will, which is our will to live and create new cells. It is only when we die that we disintegrate until eventually we become particles again. Inanimate objects such as rocks may not have a will, but they have a force, be it magnetic or gravtiational. They will eventually erode into particles the same as living beings.

February 28, 2011 at 7:03 pm
(7) Amanda Fernández says:

I’ve heard that noise too, many years ago, when I was 14. I couldn’t sleep that night, and suddenly I heard the noise. I’m very excited about this.

January 20, 2012 at 9:47 pm
(8) OzzieThinker says:

I am afraid that Einstein produced misinformation to suit a political objective. Sadly I do not know what Craig Hogan’s objectives are, who his stakeholders are and what ultimately is the “desired” political outcome of his research.

As a non-scientist, I can can divulge that the notion that our “reality” is a hologram in some ways is quite correct. Indeed there was a blind woman who had a near death experience interviewed on a mainstream documentary. She was profoundly blind from birth yet could see perfectly in her near death state.

We are all intangibly connected by what I describe as our soul in my book. The problem with words is they immediately give preempted conotation. Souls as I describe them are not “religious” souls, but merely entities that work similar to a computer hard drive. Instead they soak up life experiences. Spirits are electrical mechanisms that allow the body to journey.

Because this illusion/hologram runs tp a blueprint, there is blueprint time (or backwards time) and current time (forwards time). I do not fully understand how the combinations operate in synch, but I believe there are set points of time that are important and everything ammends around the set points.

I am not sure that the strange sounds are as described. They appear to be evidence of something very different. Their timing is the key and I haven’t worked out what that is, but would not be surprised if it had an extra-terrestial favour in view of the false history of our development presented as “fact”.

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved. 

A part of The New York Times Company.