Physics

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Physics
photo of Andrew Zimmerman Jones

Andrew's Physics Blog

By Andrew Zimmerman Jones, About.com Guide to Physics

Einstein's Theory of Relativity

Wednesday July 5, 2006
Though it revolutionized the way we look at physics, Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theory of relativity. It was deemed too controversial. Learn about it in our About Physics features on the theory of relativity:
  • Theory of Special Relativity - originally presented by Einstein in 1905, this theory defines localized effects of particles moving at extreme velocities.
  • Lorentz Transformations - the complex mathematics involved in applying the coordinate transformations required by special relativity.
  • Theory of General Relativity - expanding on special relativity, Einstein defines gravitation as a coordinate shift in spacetime coordinates
  • Controversies in Relativity - the theory of relativity has generated much controversy over the years.
  • Relativistic Doppler Effect - one of many effects of special relativity, where a moving light source generates non-classical changes in the waves emitted.

Comments

July 10, 2006 at 1:57 am
(1) Pentcho Valev says:

EINSTEIN’S SIN

The experiment of Michelson-Morley should have led to two competing interpretations:

1. As far as the speed of light is concerned, Newton’s particle model of light is correct. The speed of light is variable, c’=c+v, where c is the speed of photons relative to the light source and v is the relative speed of the light source and the observer. This interpretation is simple, even trivial: no miracles (time dilation, length contraction etc.) can be introduced.

2. The speed of light is constant, c’=c, independent of v, the relative speed of the light source and the observer. In this case miracles (time dilation, length contraction etc.) are obligatory - without them the falsehood of the principle of constancy of the speed of light would be obvious.

The first interpretation is true, the second wrong, and yet the second was adopted. That was the beginning of a wrong science of course but by no means a sin. The sin started when Einstein implicitly introduced the true c’=c+v interpretation, thereby obtaining correct results (e.g. the frequency shift factor), and conserved the false principle of constancy of the speed of light plus appended miracles, thereby destroying the rationality of generations of scientists.

In 1911 Einstein showed that in a gravitational field the speed of light is variable and advanced the formula

c’ = c(1 + V/c^2)

where V is the gravitational potential. One can apply the equivalence principle as shown in

http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~phys16/Textbook/ch13.pdf pp.2-4

Note that V=gh=cv. Substitute this in Einstein’s formula and you obtain c’=c+v.

Pentcho Valev

February 9, 2008 at 6:36 pm
(2) Gregory Gregg says:

I understand that on occasion, really brilliant concepts come from fairly ordinary sources. I know nothing about physics or math, but I had an Idea. I would try to prove it if I had the background to do so. Since I don’t, I thought one of you brains out there could run with this little ball, or if it is mere fluff, let me know.
Here it is: The smaller you get, the closer you get to the speed of light.

Where did this come from? Since everything is relative, Observing on a large scale, watching the stars for instance, things appear to move more slowly. The smaller your reference point, the faster they appear to move. At the subatomic scale, everything approaches the speed of light. What do you think? Can it be proven?

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Discuss

Community Forum

Explore Physics

About.com Special Features

How to Ace the GRE

Being well prepared is the first step; here are more essential suggestions. More >

The Business School Lowdown

Everything from choosing a school and applying, to employment after graduation. More >

Physics

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Physics

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.