1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Physics
photo of Andrew Zimmerman Jones

Andrew's Physics Blog

By Andrew Zimmerman Jones, About.com Guide to Physics

Big Bang Pushed Back?

Wednesday August 9, 2006
Recent astronomical surveys indicate that the age of the universe may be off, according to an article in New Scientist magazine. By comparing the measurements of two stars, the new analysis indicates that they are 3.14 million light-years apart, about a half a million light-years further apart than previous estimates.

The discrepancy comes in considering the Hubble constant, which was used to perform the previous estimations of the expansion rate and age of the galaxy. The value used for the constant could be off by as much as 15%, which would mean that the universe is 15% larger and older than current estimates have predicted. This would expand the age of the universe from 13.7 billion years old to 15.8 billion years old, if further measurements confirm the revised value of Hubble's "constant."

Comments

August 10, 2006 at 9:59 am
(1) Stephen says:

A slightly bigger and older Universe may be consistent with the oldest known stars. Is it consistent with WMAP results?

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Physics

About.com Special Features

A Smarter Future

Tips that will help finance your education, excel in the classroom, and advance your career. More >

How to Ace the GRE

Being well prepared is the first step; here are more essential suggestions. More >

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Physics

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.